• Cookies Policy
  • ASAI and Remote Working
  • Links
  • Publications
Ph: (01) 6137040 // Email: standards@asai.ie
linkedin
twitter
  • Welcome
  • Make a complaint
    • Advertisement or Promotion
    • Online Behavioural Avertising
  • About ASAI
  • Advertising & Self Regulation
  • ASAI Code
  • Complaints Bulletins
  • News

Household (Utilities)

May 22, 2016
by Seona Parker
Comments are off

Print This Post Print This Post
Bulletin: 16/3
Batch: 234
Reference: 24537
Product: Household (Utilities)
Advertiser: South Coast Sales (Farho)
Influencer:
Agency:
Medium: Brochure
Codes:ASAI Code 6th Edition: 1.6(c), 2.9, 2.22, 2.24

  • Advertisement
  • Complaint
  • Response
  • Conclusion
  • The brochure referred to the following:

    “The World’s most intelligent heater. Fully programmable.
    The real alternative to storage and panel heaters
    Farho – The most efficient electric heater. Save Save Save.
    Running costs on similar products can be up to 40% more…”

    Under the heading “Electric Heater Comparisons” the advertisers provided three tables for comparative purposes.

    FARHO
    AREA COVERED PANELS WATT
    7.80 sq. m 5 panel 550w
    10.94 sq. m 7 panel 770w
    14.80 sq. m 9 panel 990w
    17.20 sq. m 11 panel 1210w
    20.38 sq. m 13 panel 1430w

    COMPETITOR A
    AREA COVERED PANELS WATT
    9.00 sq. m 7 panel 770w
    11.00 sq. m 9 panel 990w
    14.00 sq. m 11 panel 1210w
    16.00 sq. m 13 panel 143w
    19.00 sq. m 15 panel 1600w
    Running Costs are 20 to 25% Higher

    COMPETITOR B
    AREA COVERED PANELS WATT
    7.50 sq. m 6 panel 750w
    10.00 sq. m 8 panel 1000w
    15.00 sq. m 11 panel 1500w
    18.00 sq. m 13 panel 1800w
    Running Costs are 40% Higher

  • The complainants, Dimpco, considered the claims made by the advertisers to be unsubstantiated claims. They queried how the advertisers could draw comparisons against unnamed competitors given that the only recognised standard for making energy consumption comparisons in Ireland was the Dwelling Energy Assessment Procedure (DEAP) administered by the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI). They also queried the use of the phrase “The world’s most intelligent heater”.
    In conclusion the complainants considered the advertising to be misleading, lacking in substantiation and not to be conforming to the principles of fair competition.

  • The advertisers said that all the information documented in their marketing material was based on information taken from their competitors’ catalogues in relation to oil filled radiators (not storage heaters). This was the basis on which they had claimed that “running costs on similar products can be up to 40% more.” Their comparisons were based on heater wattage and the amount of energy needed to heat a room on a per m2 basis

    The Executive pointed out to the advertisers that their brochure had clearly referred to their product being an alternative to storage heaters and therefore the comparisons which they were using may be misleading to consumers. They also queried whether the savings indicated had been supported by an independent source such as the SEAI.

    The advertisers said that the main aim of the information contained within in their brochure was to highlight the advantages of the Farho brand in comparison to other oil filled heater manufacturers and to inform the Public that Farho was a genuine alternative to all types of heating from storage heating to oil and gas heating. They said that their brochure had also been designed to give a general guide line on the size and the approximate number of heaters required to heat various room sizes and the advantages of using Farho as an alternative to other brands. They said, however, that the information which they had provided in their brochure had not been verified by an independent source.

    The advertisers said that they had described the Farho heater as “the world’s most intelligent heater” because they considered that while some of their competitors had some of the functions available on the Farho heater, they did not have them all. Finally they said that the brochure in question was out of print and they would be happy to liaise with the Authority before printing a new edition.

  • Complaint Upheld

    The Complaints Committee considered the details of the complaint and the advertisers’ response. They noted that the information provided in the advertising in relation to the savings consumers could expect to make by using Farho heaters had not been independently verified and the advertisers had been unable to provide substantiation for the claims made. They also noted that the advertisers had been unable to substantiate the claim that Farho was “The world’s most intelligent heater”. The Committee therefore considered the advertising to be in breach of Sections 2.9, 2.22 and 2.24 of the Code.

    Action Required:

    The Committee noted that the advertisers had consulted with the Executive in the preparation of their new brochure and that the claims would not be used again. No further action was required in the case.

Social Share

    Complaints Bulletins

    • Complaints Bulletins
      • 23/1
      • 22/4
      • 22/3
      • 22/2
      • 22/1
      • 21/5
      • 21/4
      • 21/3
      • 21/2
      • 21/1
      • 20/6
      • 20/5
      • 20/4
      • 20/3
      • 20/2
      • 20/1
      • 19/6
      • 19/5
      • 19/4
      • 19/3
      • 19/2
      • 19/1
      • 18/5
      • 18/4
      • 18/3
      • 18/2
      • 18/1
      • 17/5
      • 17/4
      • 17/3
      • 17/2
      • 17/1
      • 16/7
      • 16/6
      • 16/5
      • 16/4
      • 16/3
      • 16/2
      • 16/1
      • 15/6
      • 15/5
      • 15/4
      • 15/3
      • 15/2
      • 15/1
      • 14/8
      • 14/7
      • 14/6
      • 14/5

    Search:


    Filter by:

    Reset

    ©ASAI 2021 // 7 Herbert Street, Dublin 2, D02 K838 // Ph: (01) 6137040
    website by smudge design
    /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Complaint_Content_Type - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Complaint_Content_Type - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */
    This website uses cookies to improve your browsing and interactive experience. If you are happy to proceed with this, please click Accept

    If you wish read more about our cookie policy please Read More
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT